Programação

Dia 11 de junho: 9h - 12:30h

• Apresentação geral dos conceitos
  • complexidade das intervenções
  • descrição das intervenções (teoria da intervenção, grades do tipo tidier)
  • escopo TdR vs resultados tidier
  • avaliabilidade
  • tipo de avaliação
  • os descumprimentos da implementação
  • a importância do contexto

Dia 11 de junho: 14:00-17h

• Atividade em grupo

 Referências:
  1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011 Mar;38(2):65–76.
  2. Theory as Method: Small Theories of Treatments, Mark W. Lipsey
  3. Understand the program. Weiss
  4. Ridde V. Need for more and better implementation science in global health. BMJ Global Health Aug 2016, 1 (2) e000115
  5. Sara Van Belle, Remco van de Pas, Bruno Marchal; Towards an agenda for implementation science in global health: there is nothing more practical than good (social science) theorie; BMJ Global Health Mar 2017, 2 (2) e000181
  6. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348(mar07 3):g1687–g1687.
  7. Pfadenhauer LM, Mozygemba K, Gerhardus A, Hofmann B, Booth A, Lysdahl KB, et al. Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 2015;109(2):103–14.

Dia 12 de junho: 9h -12 :30h

 • Abordagens, estruturas e teorias para analisar a implementação
• Exemplos de análise de implementação
  • Kingdon e política
  • teoria da intervenção e FBR Burkina Faso
  • CFIR e dengue
  • CFIR + EF e corretora

Dia 12 de junho: 14:00-17h

• Atividade em grupo

Referências:
  1. Implementation evaluation, Pawson
  2. Durlak JA. What Everyone Should Know About Implementation. In: Handbook of social and emotional learning: research and practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015. p. 395–405.
  3. Durlak JA. Studying Program Implementation Is Not Easy but It Is Essential. Prevention Science. 2015 Nov;16(8):1123–7.
  4. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 50-10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
  5. Ridde V, Turcotte-Tremblay A-M, Souares A, Lohmann J, Zombré D, Koulidiati J, et al. Protocol for the process evaluation of interventions combining performance-based financing with health equity in Burkina Faso. Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 12;9(1):149.

Dia 13 de junho: 9h - 12:30h

• Problemas de métodos
  • qualitativo e estudos de caso
  • quantitativo e mensuração da fidelidade de intervenção
  • métodos mistos

Dia 13 de junho: 14:00 - 17h

 • Atividade em grupo

Referências:
  1. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implementation Science [Internet]. 2013 Dec [cited 2018 Apr 20];8(1). Available from: http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-8-51
  2. Pérez D, Van der Stuyft P, Zabala M del C, Castro M, Lefèvre P. A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions. Implementation Science [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2018 Apr 20];11(1).
  3. Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011;11:100.
  4. Shoveller J, Viehbeck S, Di Ruggiero E, Greyson D, Thomson K, Knight R. A critical examination of representations of context within research on population health interventions. Critical Public Health. 2016 Oct 19;26(5):487–500.